Huckleberry Finn Essay †A Racist Novel Example For Students

Huckleberry Finn Essay – A Racist Novel There is a major argument among literary critics whether Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, is or is not a racist novel. The question boils down to the depiction of Jim, the black slave, and to the way he is treated by Huck and other characters. The use of the word â€Å"nigger† is also a point raised by some critics, who feel that Twain uses the word too much and too loosely. Mark Twain never presents Jim in a negative light. He does not show Jim as a drunkard, as a mean person or as a cheat. This is in contrast to the way Huck’s (white) father is depicted, whom Twain escribes using all of the above characterizations and more. We see Jim as a good friend, a man devoted to his family and loyal to his companions. He is, however, very naive and superstitious. Some critics say that Twain is implying that all blacks have these qualities. When Jim turns to his magic hairball for answers about the future, we see that he does believe in some foolish things. But all the same, he is visited by both blacks and whites to use the hairball’s powers. This type of naivete was abundant at the time and found among all races-the result of a lack of proper education. So the depiction of Jim is not negative in the sense that Jim is stupid and inferior, and in this aspect of the story clearly there is no racism intended. It is next necessary to analyze the way white characters treat Jim throughout the book. Note that what the author felt is not the way most characters act around Jim, and his feelings are probably only shown through Huck. In the South during that period, black people were treated as less than humans, and Twain needed to portray this. The examples of the way Jim is denigrated: by being locked up, having to ide his face in the daytime and how he is generally derided, are necessary for historical accuracy. So, Mark Twain had to display Jim’s treatment in this manner, even if it is not the way he felt. Huck, however, does not treat Jim as most whites do. Huck looks at Jim as a friend, and by the end of their journey, disagrees with society’s notion that blacks are inferior. There are two main examples of this in the story. The first one is where Huck is disgusted by Jim’s plans to steal his own children, who are â€Å"someone else’s property. While Huck is still racist here, Twain has written the cene in a way that ridicules the notion that someone’s children can actually be the property of a stranger because the father is black. The second example is where Huck doesn’t tell Jim’s whereabouts, which would return Jim to slavery, and instead chooses to â€Å"go to Hell† for his decision. This is again Twain making a mockery of Southern values, that it is a sin to be kind to black people. Another reason that is given to say this novel is racist is the use of the word â€Å"nigger. † This is not a good reason because this is how blacks were referred to then. To have used the word Negro or African-American would have taken away from the story’s impact and make it sound stupid. If Twain wanted to write an historically accurate book, as he did, then the inclusion of this word is totally necessary. These claims that Huckleberry Finn is racist are not simply attempts to damage the image of a great novel. They come from people who are hurt by racism and don’t like seeing it in any context. However, they must realize that this novel and its author are not racist, and the purpose of the story is to prove black equality. .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .postImageUrl , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:hover , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:visited , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:active { border:0!important; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:active , .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3 .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua2294c4e8fb470988fcb08d4dc2b43e3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The three stages of Theodore Dreiser's Naturalism EssayHuckleberry Finn – A Racist Novel? There is a major argument among literary critics whether Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, is or is not a racist novel. The question boils down to the depiction of Jim, the black slave, and to the way he is treated by Huck and other characters. The use of the word â€Å"nigger† is also a point raised by some critics, who feel that Twain uses the word too much and too loosely. Mark Twain never presents Jim in a negative light. He does not show Jim as a drunkard, as a mean person or as a cheat. This is in contrast to the way Huck’s (white) father is depicted, whom Twain escribes using all of the above characterizations and more. We see Jim as a good friend, a man devoted to his family and loyal to his companions. He is, however, very naive and superstitious. Some critics say that Twain is implying that all blacks have these qualities. When Jim turns to his magic hairball for answers about the future, we see that he does believe in some foolish things. But all the same, he is visited by both blacks and whites to use the hairball’s powers. This type of naivete was abundant at the time and found among all races-the result of a lack of proper education. So the depiction of Jim is not negative in the sense that Jim is stupid and inferior, and in this aspect of the story clearly there is no racism intended. It is next necessary to analyze the way white characters treat Jim throughout the book. Note that what the author felt is not the way most characters act around Jim, and his feelings are probably only shown through Huck. In the South during that period, black people were treated as less than humans, and Twain needed to portray this. The examples of the way Jim is denigrated: by being locked up, having to ide his face in the daytime and how he is generally derided, are necessary for historical accuracy. So, Mark Twain had to display Jim’s treatment in this manner, even if it is not the way he felt. Huck, however, does not treat Jim as most whites do. Huck looks at Jim as a friend, and by the end of their journey, disagrees with society’s notion that blacks are inferior. There are two main examples of this in the story. The first one is where Huck is disgusted by Jim’s plans to steal his own children, who are â€Å"someone else’s property. While Huck is still racist here, Twain has written the cene in a way that ridicules the notion that someone’s children can actually be the property of a stranger because the father is black. The second example is where Huck doesn’t tell Jim’s whereabouts, which would return Jim to slavery, and instead chooses to â€Å"go to Hell† for his decision. This is again Twain making a mockery of Southern values, that it is a sin to be kind to black people. Another reason that is given to say this novel is racist is the use of the word â€Å"nigger. † This is not a good reason because this is how blacks were referred to then. To have used the word Negro or African-American would have taken away from the story’s impact and make it sound stupid. If Twain wanted to write an historically accurate book, as he did, then the inclusion of this word is totally necessary. These claims that Huckleberry Finn is racist are not simply attempts to damage the image of a great novel. They come from people who are hurt by racism and don’t like seeing it in any context. However, they must realize that this novel and its author are not racist, and the purpose of the story is to prove black equality.